At the end of the video, Pat Norman shows a picture of London. He explains that a constructivist would not only measure or map the city, but also study it in depth, its surroundings, its different communities, and the cultures within it.
The question to reflect on: What barriers do underrepresented students face in higher education when federally funded access programs are cut or underfunded?
If I took this as a constructivist approach, I would answer my question by looking at it through different lenses. For example, starting with students: how would they face these barriers, and how would they respond to this question? I would also consider the advisor’s perspective and the policymaker’s perspective, such as that of the Trump administration. Each of these individuals would answer the question differently. I would also reflect on the word barrier itself, because so much is embedded within it, such as race, class, immigration status, and broader social inequalities.
I would even look at the school itself. I work for Education Talent Search (ETS), which serves students at the high schools. There is a lack of college support. That is a barrier that students may face, and the school itself, if TRIO were completely gone.
I have added some links below about TRIO
ETS: https://www.ccri.edu/ets/
TRIO: https://coenet.org/
From a critical perspective, i would ask the question "does it matter that underrepresented persons have funding cut for college programs?" If the world is going to shit anyways, why go to college to learn outdated information for hundreds of thousands when you can read books and self learn.
ReplyDeleteAlso, wouldn't it behoove persons in power to cut funding to encourage students to keep their student loan debt under control, to help underrepresented persons in a position playing from behind?
Thank you for giving me clarity, how you have broken down the information is greatly appreciated.
ReplyDelete